Protect Your Drone Operations
- Don Garland
- 20 minutes ago
- 4 min read

FCC comments are due September 2, 2026. The proposal could affect future access to replacement aircraft, payloads, sensors, docks, controllers, and other critical components.
HOW TO SUBMIT YOUR COMMENT
Go to the FCC Electronic Comment Filing System:
Select the option to submit a filing.
Enter: PS Docket No. 26-189
Enter your name and organization, if applicable.
Paste your personalized comment into the filing form or upload it as a Word or PDF document.
Review your submission and file it no later than:
September 2, 2026
Save your filing confirmation for your records.
The FCC is considering a proposal that could restrict the future importation and marketing of certain foreign-produced drones and critical UAS components.
The proposal includes broad categories that could affect commercial and public-sector drone operators, including:
LiDAR systems
Thermal imaging
Autonomous drone docks
Agricultural dispensing systems
Drones weighing 55 lbs. or more
Certain payloads, sensors, controllers and other UAS components
Important
This is not currently a final ban.
The proposal would not prohibit you from continuing to operate equipment you already own.
However, if adopted, it could significantly affect future access to replacement aircraft, payloads, cameras, sensors, controllers, docking systems and other critical components.
YOUR VOICE MATTERS
The FCC is asking drone operators, businesses, agencies, manufacturers, distributors and other affected organizations to explain how the proposal could impact them.
A useful comment does not need to be long.
The most important thing is to explain what your organization actually uses, what you use it for, and what would happen if replacement equipment became difficult or impossible to obtain.
DEADLINE
September 2, 2026
FCC Proceeding: PS Docket No. 26-189
IMPORTANT PRIVACY NOTICE
FCC filings are generally public.
Do not include confidential customer information, security-sensitive facility details, proprietary information, controlled information, or personal information you do not want made public.
5 THINGS TO INCLUDE IN YOUR COMMENT
Focus on real information from your organization.
1. What do you use drones for?
Briefly explain your work.
Examples may include:
Public safety
Utility inspection
Surveying and mapping
Construction
Energy
Infrastructure inspection
Agriculture
Environmental compliance
Emergency response
2. What equipment do you rely on?
Identify the equipment that matters to your operation, such as:
Aircraft
LiDAR payloads
Thermal cameras
Other sensors
Drone docks
Controllers
Batteries
Replacement components
If you use LiDAR, explain what it actually does.
For example, whether it is used for obstacle avoidance, surveying, terrain mapping, stockpile measurement, construction documentation or infrastructure inspection.
3. How much have you invested?
Give a reasonable estimate of your total investment where possible.
Consider:
Aircraft
Payloads
Sensors
Docks
Software
Training
Integration
Batteries
Controllers
Support equipment
4. Are realistic alternatives available?
Explain whether another system could actually replace what you use today.
Consider:
Capability
Availability
Compatibility
Payload support
Software
Training
Integration
Cost
Transition time
5. What happens if replacement equipment becomes unavailable?
Explain the real operational consequences.
For example:
Aircraft downtime
Projects delayed
Increased operating costs
Lost contracts
Reduced public-safety capability
Inability to replace damaged equipment
Retraining employees
Replacing software or payload systems
Rebuilding an entire drone program
COPY AND PERSONALIZE THIS COMMENT TEMPLATE
Copy the text below and replace the bracketed sections with information about your organization.
BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
PS Docket No. 26-189
I respectfully submit these comments regarding the FCC proposal concerning the continued importation and marketing of certain previously authorized foreign-produced UAS and UAS critical components.
My name is [NAME], and I am [TITLE / ROLE] with [ORGANIZATION].
Our organization uses professional drone systems for [DESCRIBE YOUR WORK OR MISSION].
Our equipment includes [LIST IMPORTANT AIRCRAFT, PAYLOADS, SENSORS, DOCKS OR OTHER EQUIPMENT].
We use this equipment for civilian commercial or public-service purposes, including [DESCRIBE SPECIFIC USES].
For example, [DESCRIBE ONE OR TWO REAL PROJECTS OR OPERATIONS].
Our organization has invested approximately [$ AMOUNT OR RANGE] in aircraft, payloads, software, training, batteries, controllers, docking systems, integration and supporting equipment.
If replacement aircraft or critical components became unavailable, it would affect our organization by [DESCRIBE THE OPERATIONAL OR FINANCIAL IMPACT].
A functionally equivalent domestic or otherwise exempt alternative [DOES NOT CURRENTLY EXIST / IS NOT AVAILABLE IN THE QUANTITIES WE REQUIRE / WOULD COST APPROXIMATELY $___ / DOES NOT PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING CAPABILITIES: ___].
Changing systems would involve more than simply purchasing another aircraft. We would also need to replace or change [PAYLOADS, BATTERIES, CONTROLLERS, DOCKS, SOFTWARE, TRAINING, PROCEDURES, INTEGRATION OR OTHER ITEMS].
I support appropriate measures addressing genuine cybersecurity, data-security, supply-chain and national-security risks.
However, commercial technologies should be evaluated based on their actual capabilities and intended use.
In particular, ordinary commercial LiDAR, obstacle-avoidance sensors and civilian mapping equipment should not automatically be classified as military-grade simply because they use LiDAR technology.
I respectfully ask the Commission to:
Use objective capability and intended-use standards when defining military-grade equipment.
Protect ordinary obstacle-avoidance and flight-safety sensors.
Protect legitimate commercial survey and mapping LiDAR.
Protect replacement, repair and service support for previously authorized systems already owned by U.S. users.
Protect existing inventory and contractual commitments.
Consider whether alternative systems are genuinely available, functionally equivalent and economically realistic.
Provide a realistic transition period if broad restrictions are adopted.
This proposal could have a substantial impact on [MY ORGANIZATION / OUR EMPLOYEES / OUR CUSTOMERS / THE PUBLIC WE SERVE].
I respectfully ask the Commission to consider the real-world impact on organizations that invested in previously authorized professional drone equipment in good faith.
Respectfully submitted,
[NAME]
[TITLE / ORGANIZATION]
[CITY AND STATE]
[DATE]
SUBMIT YOUR COMMENT
Deadline: September 2, 2026
Proceeding: PS Docket No. 26-189
File at: https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs
Drones Plus Robotics will also be submitting comments to the FCC.
We encourage every affected drone operator, business and agency to make its experience heard.


Comments